StarTrekVoyager.com

Friendly Star Trek Discussions
It is currently Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:21 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Is Star Trek (T.V. wise) dead?
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:46 am 
Offline
Crewman

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 3
I don't know if and when this new series called Star Trek: Cardinal is going to air. I've been reading up on this supposedly up-and-coming Star Trek series and - I've got to tell ya - it doesn't sound very promising.
From what I have read about the ST Cardinal storyline it sounds more and more like a stale, politically ventured Space Opera.

Star Trek Voyager introduced quite a number of different interesting things in it's 7 years of travel in the Delta Quadrant. Personally, I felt very empty and let down with the final Voyager (Endgame) episode and then having to read the novels just to get an idea of things went when Voyager made it back home. I guess it too late to cry over spilled milk but there was at least another 2 years of writing that could have be written for the Voyager series to remain a very interesting series. I can't believe the Star Trek Franchise and the producers of the show basically coincided Voyager's return home with the end of the series when there was a multitude of other things to keep the series going well for quite a while.

Then came Star Trek: Enterprise. That series must have been the swan-song of Star Trek Franchise - or something. In my opinion only one espisode of that series was worth watching: Regeneration. Most of the other episodes were not very palatible at all. The series as a whole was downright horrible.

This new Star Trek Cardinal doesn't sound very palatible either. Doesn't sound like there is going to be very much (if any) hold-over of characters and ideas from the Voyager series. The only one they've eluded to so far is Naomi Wildman. Big deal. What about the Borg? Species 8472? Trans Warp or Quantum Slipstream? The Delta Quadrant? Or how about travel outside of the Galaxy?

If I didn't know any better - I'd say Star Trek was dead alright.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:36 pm 
Offline
Lux Mihi Deus
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 7:00 pm
Posts: 27261
Location: United States of America
I hadn't heard of STC at all, which is rather sad. I used to be into Trek so much more than I am now. I just read the synopsis at http://www.startrekcardinal.com/, and think I'll withold judgement until seeing it, if that happens. (another article stated CBS may be picking it up?) It certainly doesn't jump out and grab you, though. I'm hoping for something similar to DS9, which IMO, was far superior to any other Trek, except TOS. (I'm sentimental, ;) ) I'm hoping that if picked up, this show can do something about bringing in a fresh audience.

_________________
Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:32 pm 
Offline
Crewman

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 3
I couldn't bring myself to watch very many episodes of the DS9 series. IMO the DS9 series was likened to a politically ventured Space Opera as well.

I liked ST Voyager a great deal. To me it was more akin to TOS; being out there in unknown territory, 70,000 light years from home, and such. But, what really made Voyager ultimately interesting (especially the last 4 seasons) was Voyager's encounters with the Borg which IMO were pretty close to being hightlights of the series.

TNG was a very good series too. I didn't miss an episode.

Of course I enjoyed TOS as well. Before I got into computers and the internet, was always look out for re-runs of TOS. Fancast.com has them all on their website.

Youtube used to have all of the TNG episodes but now there aren't very many left to watch anymore. Maybe just a small handful (if any) of DS9 episodes left on Youtube. All but 20 Voyager episodes on Youtube...just finished watching the last episode (Endgame) about a week ago, then on to the Homecoming and The Farther Shore novels.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:20 pm 
Offline
Lux Mihi Deus
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 7:00 pm
Posts: 27261
Location: United States of America
For the most part, I couldn't stand TNG. I can't point to anything specific in the series that bothered me, though. I love DS9. It got... different at times, but it was the best at character development, IMO. I like drama and cliffhangers and people who can admit they're wrong. And also a show that doesn't show everything in black and white.
Janeway's know-it-all, "I'm always right" attitude got old fast for me. She also came across as pretty judgemental with A LOT of double standards. Example, "all Kazon are bad, but some Borg can be good." Seriously?

_________________
Some of us fall by the wayside
And some of us soar to the stars
And some of us sail through our troubles
And some have to live with our scars


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:32 pm 
Offline
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:28 am
Posts: 148
i agree with theresa TNG wasnt very fun to watch,not enought action and as for Voyager,it just get on my nerve sometime i would like this series to be more like DS9.i still have to agree that it would be pretty cool to know what happenned with the borg and Species 8472,but for the rest i would prefer if it would be like DS9


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:59 pm 
Offline
Junior Cadet

Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:35 am
Posts: 17
Is Star Trek Cardinal a real show or a fan made show for the web may I ask?

_________________
Like Punk -
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:55 pm 
Offline
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:28 am
Posts: 148
not sure ive seen alot of fan series online sadly nothing canon seem to be on the way :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:33 am 
Offline
Rear Admiral
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2001 7:00 pm
Posts: 4725
Villordsutch wrote:
Is Star Trek Cardinal a real show or a fan made show for the web may I ask?


http://www.startrekcardinal.com/ has the feel of a fan site. But after some digging around :D it looks like its a real show that might happen, if the ship is the one off http://www.startrekcardinal.com/ it would be a different approach than the "normal" looking ST ships of the ages. :D

There's a lot of things to consider with this new trek show. The setting, ST:E for instance, being set before ST:TOS was not something i was terribly fond of Although given the ships design on the website, it looks like it would be set sometime after voyager, which then introduces the problem of the what kinda conflict to invoke without revisiting to much TOS, VOY,DS9,ENT, TNG,

you could say have the whole series envelop an all out war with a new threat or something? but i dont know....

Also, i cant remember where the borg entirely wiped out after voy? or was it just most of them?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:28 am 
Offline
Rear Admiral
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 7:00 pm
Posts: 2821
Location: Mississippi, USA
Star Trek has many places for potential in a series. This Star Trek Cardinal sounds like a fan fiction writers attempt at creating their own series in the Trek universe rather than a real CBS paramount attempt at reviving the Trek Franchise. However after the success of the Star Trek prequel movie, I think it shows that Trek is not really dead, it was just in the hands of a group of people that let it grow stale and not change with the times. I noticed many times throughout ENT and VOY that many story lines from earlier episodes seemed to be repeated. I think if they start from Scratch like TNG did and depart from the past completely and go in another direction like VOY did then they can really create something worth watching. But no Trek is not dead, it is simply in hibernation waiting on someone to take the helm that can give us something we have not seen yet.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:36 am 
Offline
Crewman
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 3
Location: Rural New Mexico
I think that television in general has changed so much over the past five years. The thing these days is "reality" shows, which are extremely cheap to produce. It would take a fantastic pitch with great characters and a compelling storyline for a network to take on a new Trek series. I hope it happens, though!

_________________
My real life Star Trek stories at at www.campstrange.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:11 pm 
Offline
Ensign
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:09 am
Posts: 49
Location: Europe
If they continue on the path they have taken so far, yes.
Too much, too quickly after each other.

And they are stuck on the same mantra. Prequel after prequel.

Quite frankly, they have done a very poor job in maintaining interest. If people are willing to get into a fight over who would win in Borg vs Dominion, how can you get people to lose interest?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 3:58 pm 
Offline
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:28 am
Posts: 148
true,that they did a very poor job to keep ppl interested,i mean even stargate get new series,why dont star trek get a new one?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 4:39 am 
Offline
Lieutenant

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 6:00 pm
Posts: 136
Location: Classified
I am gonna wait until i see the series first before i judge it.At least star trek is still alive and running and i am thankful for that :D

_________________
Here is some new information on the USS AXIS: http://members.tripod.com/Axis_Project/specs.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:10 am 
Offline
Crewman

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:36 pm
Posts: 4
i think i am looking forward to a new series. but i thought the last series Enterprise, was pretty much crap. so who knows how it will go.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:06 am 
Offline
Crewman

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:59 pm
Posts: 3
Location: Cambridge
Given JJ Abrams of Lost fame was at the helm for the movie, I wonder if he might have any thoughts/involvment to a TV series as well as the film series. Given that there is also a different timeline running thanks to the movie, there is a whole new potential out there for other things to try.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Star Trek (T.V. wise) dead?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:50 pm 
Offline
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 12:55 pm
Posts: 146
Location: California
CasualTrekAdmirer wrote:
I don't know if and when this new series called Star Trek: Cardinal is going to air. I've been reading up on this supposedly up-and-coming Star Trek series and - I've got to tell ya - it doesn't sound very promising.
From what I have read about the ST Cardinal storyline it sounds more and more like a stale, politically ventured Space Opera.

Star Trek Voyager introduced quite a number of different interesting things in it's 7 years of travel in the Delta Quadrant. Personally, I felt very empty and let down with the final Voyager (Endgame) episode and then having to read the novels just to get an idea of things went when Voyager made it back home. I guess it too late to cry over spilled milk but there was at least another 2 years of writing that could have be written for the Voyager series to remain a very interesting series. I can't believe the Star Trek Franchise and the producers of the show basically coincided Voyager's return home with the end of the series when there was a multitude of other things to keep the series going well for quite a while.

Then came Star Trek: Enterprise. That series must have been the swan-song of Star Trek Franchise - or something. In my opinion only one espisode of that series was worth watching: Regeneration. Most of the other episodes were not very palatible at all. The series as a whole was downright horrible.

This new Star Trek Cardinal doesn't sound very palatible either. Doesn't sound like there is going to be very much (if any) hold-over of characters and ideas from the Voyager series. The only one they've eluded to so far is Naomi Wildman. Big deal. What about the Borg? Species 8472? Trans Warp or Quantum Slipstream? The Delta Quadrant? Or how about travel outside of the Galaxy?

If I didn't know any better - I'd say Star Trek was dead alright.


I didn't even know about a possible new series. What are the details? As for Voyager: I had always hoped they would do a miniseries about Voyager after they got home, or maybe a made-for-tv movie? I mean, Stargate: SG1 got two movies, and Battlestar Galactica had their movies made.... But, back to Voyager. "Endgame" was good for me, but it ended slightly too quickly. At the very least, I would have like to have seen what happened after they landed and the Maquis and Seven of Nine got off the ship.

As for Enterprise, I thought it was a good series overall, with some really great episodes: "Terra Nova", "Oasis", "Shockwave (pts 1 & 2 )", "Carbon Creek", "Vanishing Point", "Regeneration" (of course), "First Flight", "The Expanse", "Twilight", "North Star", "Similitude", "Carpenter Street", "Doctor's Orders", "E2","Zero Hour", "Storm Front (pts 1 & 2)", "Home", "Divergence", "In A Mirror, Darkly (pts 1 & 2)", "Terra Prime", "These Are The Voyages". That finale' was especially nice.

I don't think that the Star Trek franchise is dead. Star Trek will only die when people stop caring about it. When they stop caring about their own futures really, and I don't think that's happened just yet. Just take a look at this forum and you can see what I mean....

Getting back to this possible new series.... It would be nice to see more of Starfleet's timeships (try saying that ten times fast) like in the Voyager episode "Relativity". They could probably build a whole series based on a timeship and their experiences with the temporal prime directive. Any thoughts on that?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:09 am 
Offline
Freshman Cadet

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:52 am
Posts: 6
I've been following the whole Cardinal thing since I saw them at the Vegas convention. As someone who is hard to please, I was actually really impressed with the idea, the layout and the characters. I have a few issues, but I'm sure no matter what they did I'd have issues. I think my biggest problem is that this is being billed as some kind of fan series brought to life; as if this is a grassroots movement indipendent of Hollywood and therefore not subject to its medling. The sad truth is that the people running it are real writers and directors, and frankly I don't trust anyone on the inside with Star Trek. I'd rather a real fan movement got a series on the air.

But hey, we live in the real world, and I know that's unlikely. From what I've seen of this thing and especially with the other hair-brained ideas out there, this is by far the best.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:37 am 
Offline
Ensign
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:09 am
Posts: 49
Location: Europe
I would suggest to the Star Trek people that a new series should be set far away in the future. Like the time of Enterprise J when they can travel to other Galaxies. Or just before humanity evolves beyond the Q.
Such a leap in time would give much more freedom and not danger canon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:58 pm 
Offline
Sophomore Cadet

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:39 pm
Posts: 13
Personally, I believe VOY should be extended, into a film maybe. I was not satisfied with the ending nor the book. If this cannot be done.. a new series!

I was disappointed with finding out what Cardinal was.. the storylines okay, but I seriously thought it was going to be a proper show, not some fanfic writers desperately trying to make a breakthrough.

WE NEED A NEW SERIES. Bigger, better, and more original. I was disappointed with the fact that Cardinal had an EMH too. Please! The Doctor on VOY was the one and only.. as he'd say; "I'm a hologram, not a copy machine!"

(I posted this on a thread by accident).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:44 pm 
Offline
Fleet Admiral
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2001 7:00 pm
Posts: 14969
Location: Wisconsin
The_Seventh_of_the_Ninth wrote:
Please! The Doctor on VOY was the one and only..


He may have been "the one and only," but he could've easily appeared on the Cardinal just as he did on the U.S.S. Enterprise-D (or E I forget) under Captain Picard...so it's not totally impossible, but he definately was unique ;) , even though he wasn't the only medical hologram ever made...Doctor Zimmerman himself said so in that one VOY episode that I forget what it's called lol


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:37 pm 
Offline
Sophomore Cadet

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:39 pm
Posts: 13
Ah, I know! But the Doctor was himself. He was more than a Hologram. He was so close to humanity, despite being made of electrons.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:08 pm 
Offline
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 12:55 pm
Posts: 146
Location: California
The_Seventh_of_the_Ninth wrote:
Ah, I know! But the Doctor was himself. He was more than a Hologram. He was so close to humanity, despite being made of electrons.


Ha-HA!! I have fans!!

_________________
"I'm a doctor, not a lightbulb!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:28 am 
Offline
Freshman Cadet

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:52 am
Posts: 6
The_Seventh_of_the_Ninth wrote:
Ah, I know! But the Doctor was himself. He was more than a Hologram. He was so close to humanity, despite being made of electrons.


Well in fairness, he's basicly just another piece of technology on cardinal, not really a character. From what I can tell, he looks more like the voice of the computer than a character.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:07 pm 
Offline
Sophomore Cadet

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:39 pm
Posts: 13
Yeah, I kinda got that feeling too, but to me it just seems that they're copying the Doctor, and yet putting zero effort into the Chief of Medicine.
I know the Doctor was under Captain Picard in First Contact, but that was funny guest appearance. Especially with his famous im-a-doctor-not-a sayings: "I'm a Doctor, not a doorstop!"

While writing my own little Star Trek fictions, I was so tempted to write in an E.M.H.. but I resisted. I just didn't want to copy the one and only (Yes, you do have many fans, Doctor!).

We need new ideas..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 2:47 am 
Offline
Freshman Cadet

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:52 am
Posts: 6
The_Seventh_of_the_Ninth wrote:
Yeah, I kinda got that feeling too, but to me it just seems that they're copying the Doctor, and yet putting zero effort into the Chief of Medicine.
I know the Doctor was under Captain Picard in First Contact, but that was funny guest appearance. Especially with his famous im-a-doctor-not-a sayings: "I'm a Doctor, not a doorstop!"

While writing my own little Star Trek fictions, I was so tempted to write in an E.M.H.. but I resisted. I just didn't want to copy the one and only (Yes, you do have many fans, Doctor!).

We need new ideas..


yeah, but he's not the CMO, that girl is. I kinda like the idea of having a medic instead of a full doctor. Makes sense on a small ship. Why bother putting a surgeon on a ship with a dozen people?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group